Feeds:
Posts
Comments

For IBM’s recent Global CMO Study (http://www-935.ibm.com/services/us/cmo/cmostudy2011/cmo-registration.html), 1,734 CMOs were interviewed and asked about their most pressing issues. Their biggest concern? The ever-larger amounts of data which they’re expected to understand and act on – a whopping 71% of CMOs interviewed said they felt unprepared to deal with the massive amounts of data now being captured by their organizations on customers and prospects.

As businesses become more sophisticated in capturing data on every facet of the customer interaction, they’ve accumulated an enormous treasure-trove of information. However, as this study reveals, in most cases they don’t know what to do with it! As we’ve long maintained, although all insight starts with data, it can’t stop there – gathering the data and even analyzing it aren’t enough. It has to be done with intelligence, it has to be done with the aim of generating actionable insight – and it has to be done quickly enough so that the insights are still relevant to the ever-changing market conditions that CMOs face today.

Last Wednesday at PNT’s 6th quarterly Customer Intelligence Gathering, Mary Beth Sullivan (Managing Partner of Capital Performance Group) spoke on making better use of customer insights to drive profitability in banks. Before the financial crisis of 2008, banks basically didn’t have to pay too much attention to customers – individual consumers were all too eager to load up on credit card and mortgage debt, and banks were all too willing to lend to them. It was a volume business with relatively thin margins, so the more the banks lent, the more money they made. We all know what happened after that: housing cratered, consumers walked away from mortgages in droves, net losses piled up on credit card debt, and households in general began a long and painful process of “deleveraging” – getting rid of debt, one way or another.

Now banks face a long, tough road ahead: rebuilding shredded balance sheets, lack of loan demand, increasingly stringent government regulations, reduced fee income, and a lack of customer trust and loyalty (especially among larger institutions), among other obstacles. So what observations and advice did Mary Beth offer to help navigate these untested waters?

1. Customers are redefining value – so customer engagement will become even more important

Customers want security, personalization, simplification, value, and are more comfortable with technology. They are also distrustful of “big brand” banks and want advice from their peers. Given this attitudinal shift, banks need to really engage their customers and differentiate themselves from their competition by listening and responding carefully to the new customer needs – customer intelligence will be key to this engagement.

2. Banks are also redefining value, and have a set of critical financial objectives

Just as customers are redefining value, so too are banks. They have to further diversify revenue streams (even today, fully 75% of bank profits come from lending activities), focus on customer relationships (see above!), create new sources of fee income, improve the efficiency of their operations, and compete on customer experience and not on price. Succeeding now means being responsive to each customer, being efficient, creating meaningful customer experiences, and doing it with a wide variety of services and solutions that address a multitude of customers’ financial concerns.

3. Success, therefore, means adopting a new set of strategic priorities

To succeed, banks must respond to the new competitive pressures in the marketplace (the recent financial crisis, new government rules and regulations, changing customer needs and attitudes, new technologies) and develop new strategies for success over the long term. They need to have more customer-centric (and less product-centric) business models, move away from product commoditization and towards product customization, integrate marketing and delivery, differentiate themselves further through branding, be ruthlessly efficient, and leverage information technology to deliver more process-driven, standardized, and effective sales and customer management activities.

4. Customer intelligence will be a key component of this success

To achieve these new strategic objectives, customer intelligence will be key. According to famed business guru Peter Drucker, a business really has only two basic functions that produce results: marketing and innovation. These both rely heavily on understanding the customer and developing an intimate relationship that drives the products that are developed, the brand, how messages are developed and communicated, and, ultimately, the revenue and profitability that are generated from each customer relationship.  Banks need to pay more attention to the kinds of things customers need to get done, and then develop products and services that will help them – rather than just sell more of the “same old” traditional banking products such as checking, savings, loans, and so on (no customer has ever said they really “need” a checking account, for instance; what they need is a way to keep money safe and to move it around whenever they need to, to and from whomever and whatever they need to). Notice that this implies getting and using customer feedback – a critical part of customer intelligence – to gauge whether the bank is moving along in the right direction in meeting customer needs; the new world is more than ever a two-way street between banks and their customers, as products and services are developed and delivered in a far more interactive and customized way than ever before.

To be sure, this is going to be a difficult transition. Many large institutions are saddled with legacy products, systems,  infrastructure, processes, and culture that are going to make it very difficult to change and adapt to the new environment. Those that succeed will create meaningful customer relationships through the development, delivery, and communication of services and products that are driven by an understanding of customer needs based on true, two-way customer intelligence.

For further information and to register to receive a copy of Mary Beth’s presentation, please visit our website on http://www.pntmarketingservices.com.

Last night at the Harvard Club of NYC, PNT hosted (along with our co-sponsor, Neolane) our 5th quarterly Customer Intelligence Gathering. Our guest-speakers, Bernice Grossman of DMRS Group and Ruth Stevens of eMarketing Strategy, presented research on B2B list quality and depth to an audience of customer intelligence professionals, bankers, vendors, and even two DMA Echo Awards judges in from South Africa!

Your Data are a Valuable Asset

Bernice started by reminding us that data on our suspects, prospects, and customers are a valuable asset “that should be listed on the balance sheet.” So, whenever we are looking to add to that store of valuable data, for example, by purchasing 3rd-party B2B data, we should be extremely careful to make sure that we match the business need to the depth and quality of the data we are about to purchase. For example, if our goal is to support an e-mail campaign to target prospects in the 8011 SIC code (medical doctors), then we want to make sure the data we purchase is up to the task – that the list vendor has significant coverage of Medical Doctors, and that a significant portion of those Doctors have up-to-date, mailable e-mail addresses.

Coverage and Quality

Which brings us to “coverage” and “quality.” If you’re sourcing a list of medical doctors (SIC, or Standard Industrial Classification Code, of 8011), you want to make sure that source has pretty complete coverage – that is, that they’ve got as close to 100% of the medical doctors in their list. If they only have half the doctors in your target geography on their list, and you want to target every single doctor in your target geography with a special offer, then for your purposes it won’t be a very good list. Ruth and Bernice recommend that you always do a test of each vendor you’ll be working with, and ask for counts of all firms in a particular SIC code (or set of SIC codes) in the particular geography you’re working in, to see if the coverage is suitable for your purposes.

You also need to be concerned with quality. Here Bernice was quick to point out that when you speak to a vendor, you should speak common-sense, plain English to explain that you want a list that will have the quality you need to do what you want to do with it – so, if you’re e-mailing the list, you’ll want to make sure that the e-mail addresses provided are (1) the correct e-mail addresses for the contacts on the list, and (2) that they won’t bounce back. If you’re doing a direct mail, you’ll want to make sure all the addresses are mailable. If you’re doing a telemarketing campaign, you’ll want to be sure that the phone numbers are all live and that they reach the contact in the list – you get the idea.

Compiled vs. Response

Ruth made sure to distinguish in their research between “compiled” and “response” lists. Compiled lists are those that are compiled from publicly-available data sources, like phone books, the internet, public legal filings and records, and so on. Response lists are those which consist of contact and firm names of people who have taken some kind of action – they subscribed to a magazine or periodical, donated to a political or charitable cause, took advantage of a merchandise offering, and so on. Depending on your purpose, you may find that a compiled list has better coverage and quality for you, or you may find that a response list will do the trick.

It’s Good to Have a Purpose

Which brings us to purpose: you’re really not going to know which list is better for you (compiled vs. response) or which has better coverage or quality, unless you know what you’re going to use it for. Just because one list has more names on it for a given SIC code than another may not mean it’s better – if you’re going to do telemarketing and none of those names have a direct contact phone, then it’s going to be pretty useless. Likewise, if you’re looking for the “cheapest” list for a mailing to attorneys (SIC = 8111), but half of the addresses are incomplete and unmailable, then no matter how cheap it is you won’t have gotten your money’s worth. The short answer is that part of what determines whether a list is good or bad determines on whether or not it’s the right list for your purpose and not on any inherent list qualities like presence or fill-rate of e-mail addresses or phone numbers.

Always Test and Don’t be Cheap!

As Bernice said, always test the list before you buy (even if it takes extra time up front, you’ll save time and money later), and don’t be cheap! Maintenance of a quality list takes time and effort and is costly to ensure all information is accurate and up-to-date, and that the coverage is as complete as possible.  It’s like the difference between a $10 shirt from a street-vendor or a $75 shirt from Brooks Brothers: if you don’t mind an ill-fitting, uncomfortable, flimsy and unattractive shirt, by all means save the money. However, if you are planning to wear it with a nice suit and attend business meetings (keep that purpose in mind!), it might be a better investment to buy that Brooks Brothers all-cotton button-down.

More Information

Bernice and Ruth graciously made their presentation available to attendees, which we will send out shortly. It details the various vendors they compared and how they fared in the tests. If you could not make it, please feel free to e-mail or call us at 1.888.PNT.2210 for a copy!

 

Some important and timely reminders on bank loyalty programs:

BAI | Banking Strategies | Marketing & Sales | Marketing and Promotion | Earning Rewards from Rewards Programs.

Another point to consider that we’ve been trying to impress upon bank marketers in our Offer Management practice:

Giving away non-banking merchandise is more like a bribe to stay than delivering on a financial value proposition.

Granted, there’s a lot of competitive pressure now to offer these points programs, it’s important nevertheless to distinguish between offers that are good for acquiring new customers and those that are good for retaining and building the loyalty of existing customers.

Therefore loyalty programs should be carefully crafted to encourage a wide range of use of bank products and services in an ongoing manner – especially “sticky” services that are correlated with retained customer satisfaction. Whereas acquisition offers will typically offer a higher up-front reward for switching. And onboarding offers will transition from that up-front reward to the pleasures of ongoing loyalty rewards.

In other words, customer offers should follow the life-cycle of your customers’ relationship with you, from acquisition to onboarding to nurture and long term loyalty that extends lifetime customer value (for the bank and the customer).

In my latest post on the New York Enterprise Report website, I referenced a refreshing and excellent article in the Wall Street Journal by Susan Cramm entitled “Put IT Where It Belongs.” Back in the 80’s and early 90’s, managers and other non-IT types were empowered to control their own use of technology within a business – from installing their own software, writing their own reports, developing and implementing initiatives without the dreaded “IT bottleneck.”

Today, it’s about IT tail wagging the business dog- the enormous amount of political control (not to mention budget and resources) amassed by internal IT departments and their ability to dictate to the business what can and can’t be done.  I’m sure many of us have felt that there is no way out of this terrible state of affairs and we question how we can put IT in its proper place – under control of the business and not the other way around.

Read the full post on the PNT website

An interesting article in the latest issue of Banking Strategies on the importance of Customer Onboarding strategies for maximizing customer retention and profitability, especially in light of recent regulatory changes that may reduce existing revenue streams:

BAI | Banking Strategies | Strategy | Retail Consumer Banking | Customer Onboarding to the Rescue.

I’d add that many banks fail to monitor the stream of knowledge customers provide on their needs and preferences in the form of their transactional and channel behaviors. In effect, customers give us lots of information about how they like to bank all the time by performing transactions in different channels. By paying attention, bankers can respond promptly to customers’ actual preferences and needs and short-circuit attrition risk. Unfortunately, many, if not most, banks fail to monitor this stream of valuable information or, if they do, have not engineered automatic responses into their monitoring programs.

Our onboarding program at PNT leverages our Customer Activity and Response Engine (CARE) which monitors the complete customer behavioral profile allowing the bank to be responsive to how the customer uses its services, providing the right communications and offers to the right customers at the right time in the right channel.

Wider adoption of this approach will engage customers and allow them to feel confident in relying on their bank to respond to their preferences and needs as they grow and change over time.

- Adam Isler

Capital One: Card Rewards Programs Fluster Some Consumers.

Of course Capital One is trying to make a point with their research – they want consumers to note that their program is not prey to the issues that fluster others.

At PNT we support hundreds of these programs and we have long felt that for loyalty programs to actually sustain loyalty they should not take the form of non-bank offers. Essentially, banks are saying to their customers something like,”we know you don’t especially like banking with us but if we throw in an iPad (or  a hotel room or toaster or golf clubs) a year from now, will you please stay with us?”

Furthermore, many customers are probably savvy enough to know that the “free gifts” have a cost which is being passed on to them so, for some segments at least, these programs introduce a soupçon of distrust – never good for building loyalty.

We think rewards programs should focus on bank offerings: reduced fees, better interest, more financial services. That creates a stronger, long-term relationship with customers by providing value from the bank’s core competence rather than bribing them with products and services customers should be able to secure for themselves from the businesses whose competence they are.

Of course by now the banks have dug themselves a bit of a hole – customers expect to be rewarded with points or cash for bringing their business so it will be a brave bank that discontinues their cash rewards in favor of better customer value upfront. They can dig themselves out by shifting their programs to in-kind rewards over time and designing their programs to make loyalty a two-way street.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.